Complex Transactions, Clear Conclusions

Anonymised examples of complex accounting matters where technical analysis helped management reach clear and supportable accounting conclusions.

Case Study 01

Control assessment in an acquisition

IFRS 10 · Consolidation
  1. Situation

    A client was considering an acquisition that gave it significant economic exposure and participation in key decisions, but the contractual rights did not automatically result in control for accounting purposes.

  2. Accounting issue

    The key question was whether the arrangement met the control requirements under IFRS 10 and whether consolidation was required.

  3. Our role

    We reviewed the ownership structure, shareholder agreements, and relevant contractual arrangements to assess whether the investor had control as per IFRS 10.

  4. Outcome

    The analysis supported the conclusion that investor did not control the investee although it owned more than 50% shares and consolidation was therefore not required. The accounting position was documented for management and was successfully defended with auditors.

Case Study 02

Timing of revenue recognition

IFRS 15 · Revenue
  1. Situation

    A client was entering into a commercial arrangement where the timing of revenue recognition was a significant financial reporting consideration.

  2. Accounting issue

    The question was whether the contractual terms and transfer of risk and rewards supported recognition of revenue at an earlier time instead of being recognized over a longer duration of time under IFRS 15.

  3. Our role

    We analysed the contractual terms, performance obligations and transfer of risk and reward, and considered how different transaction structures would affect the accounting outcome.

  4. Outcome

    The final structure and supporting accounting analysis resulted in a supportable conclusion that revenue should be recognised and was successfully reviewed with auditors.

Case Study 03

Remediation of an audit qualification

IFRS 9 · Expected credit losses
  1. Situation

    A client had an audit qualification arising from concerns over the recognition and measurement of expected credit losses on financial assets.

  2. Accounting issue

    The key challenge was to develop an accounting approach that satisfies IFRS 9 and truly and fairly reflected the credit risk and the characteristics of the underlying exposures.

  3. Our role

    We reviewed the existing methodology, identified areas triggering audit concerns, developed a revised accounting approach and supported management in documenting the assumptions, methodology and resulting in an accounting treatment acceptable for auditors.

  4. Outcome

    The revised approach addressed the underlying accounting issue and supported resolution of the audit qualification, resulting in an unqualified audit opinion.

Book free 20 minutes to discuss a transaction

We help CFOs, finance leaders and professionals to address the accounting implications of complex transactions.

Ivy Deals

Accounting Clarity for Complex Transactions

Independent IFRS advisory on complex transactions. We are not auditors.

We do not audit. Ivy Deals provides accounting advice only, which means we can take a position on a contentious matter without the independence constraints that apply to your auditors — and without any interest in the answer that is easiest to sign.

Information on this website is general in nature and does not constitute accounting, legal, tax, investment or other professional advice. Accounting conclusions depend on the specific facts and circumstances of each transaction and the applicable reporting framework. Formal advice should be obtained before acting on any information contained on this website.